There has been a ton of press around Net Neutrality lately. Net neutrality is the concept that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the Internet equally, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of communication. Companies, like Comcast, stand to make a lot of money based on how federal regulators decide on how to treat net neutrality. If regulators find in favor of ISPs they can start charging more for faster internet access, basically creating the haves and the have nots of the internet – or the ‘fast lane’ and the ‘slow lane’.
It’s a basic concept. Everyone should be treated equal. Big powerful companies and small powerless people. Or should they?
First and foremost I’m a capitalist. I like to pay more, and sit in better seats at sporting events. I pay high taxes so I can live in a better neighborhood and police will actually come to my house when I call. If I want my internet to come through a firehose instead of a garden hose, I’ll pay for it!
I get it though. The American Dream is now a ‘dream’ more than ever for most people simply because they’ll never make it a reality. We are a nation of haves, and have nots, but mostly of have nots.
The concept of neutrality is also something HR Pros take to heart. We attempt to treat everyone equally. In many ways this is good. Male/female, old/young, black/white, we have an obligation to treat our employees the same. But we take it to far.
Net Neutrality doesn’t say some will get the internet, and some will not. It says some will get the internet faster because they paid to have it faster. Those who are upset over this issue are upset because they’ll be treated differently. It’s the same reason HR Pros tend to try and treat all employees the same. If I treat everyone the same, no one can complain they were treated differently. Therein lies the problem, your best employees don’t want HR Neutrality!
Your best employees want to be treated differently. They see Timmy slacking off and not pulling his weight, and they HATE you treat Timmy the same as you treat them. They want to be treated differently than Timmy. They want faster internet. They feel they deserve it. They feel they deserve to be treated better than you treat your average and below average employees.
So, this begs the question, why is HR Neutrality so prevalent in our industry? Our leadership doesn’t like either. Remember, your leaders are leaders because they were once your best employees. They hate you treat everyone equally as well. Our employees hate HR Neutrality. Our leadership hates HR Neutrality. Yet, we continue to profess HR Neutrality. Is HR morally better than the rest of our organization? Or, are we afraid that eliminating HR Neutrality will shine a bigger light upon our own shortcomings as a function?
Either way, I want the faster internet.