Before we get right in and answer this question, let’s all get on the same page. What is Poaching? Wiki defines it as:
“Poaching has traditionally been defined as the illegal hunting, killing or capturing of wild animals, usually associated with land use rights.”
It can also be a cooking term, like Poached Eggs or Poached Salmon, but that’s not what we’re talking about.
The fact of the matter is that I don’t like the term ‘Poaching’ when it is used regarding talent acquisition. Business Insider loves to use this in titles when they are talking about normal recruiting activity (Here, Here, and Here to share just a few). There’s nothing illegal about ‘recruiting’ someone from another firm. Nothing!
Google has a talented group of Software Developers. Facebook needs Software Developers. Facebook recruits Google developers to come work for them. That’s Recruiting at its most basic. Nothing illegal about that. That’s actually the basis of our capitalist society. Free market economy.
So, why is it that we use the word “Poach” when describing something that is just basic business?
It’s because when an employee leaves you for your competition it pisses you off! You feel robbed. You feel like it should be illegal. “Wait! I spent so much time and effort to get you hear and now you’re just leaving me, for her!!!”
But, it’s not illegal. It’s not ‘poaching’. It’s business. You either do it well, or you use words like ‘poach’.
Can Corporate Recruiters ‘poach’?
Let me put it to you this way. If I was running your corporate talent acquisition department, and we had a recruiter who felt like they shouldn’t ‘poach’ from the competition, I would ask that recruiter to go work for the competition! At that point, that’s basically what they are doing anyway!
I feel so strongly about this, I truly believe a really good corporate recruiting function can cripple your competition. Truly! If your corporate recruiters take the best talent from your competition and bring them to your team, your competition isn’t long for this world. “Oh, yeah, but that’s poaching, Tim.” No, that’s Capitalism. That’s free market. It’s what our country is built on.
So, what I’m trying to say is this, if you don’t poach your competition’s talent you’re not American!
Pingback: Corporate Poaching - Search Solution Group
Pingback: Safeguarding Employees from Poaching - WorkCompassWorkCompass
I do not know whether it’s just me or if perhaps everybody
else experiencing problems with your site. It appears as though some of the
text in your posts are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me
know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my web
browser because I’ve had this happen previously.
Hello, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues.
When I look at your blog site in Ie, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer,
it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a
quick heads up! Other then that, superb blog!
I just like the helpful information you supply to your articles.
I’ll bookmark your blog and check once more here regularly.
I am somewhat certain I’ll be told many new stuff right right here!
Best of luck for the following!
Hey Tim – whenever I’ve used “poach” as an internal recruiter, it refers to contacting existing employees from other business units, which is generally not received well (in most large companies we have a rule that we only contact internal candidates who have explicitly applied).
Proactively sourcing employees from competitors is highly encouraged, unless there is some sort of non-compete in place (it’s more applicable to government work than your Facebook/Google example).
I will agree with you that the news sites could paint a better picture of what we do.
And to clarify…I cannot believe people would not recruit from their competition. That is potentially a double win.
I cannot even believe this is a real question. Are there really people that believe this? I am a little flabbergasted.
If you think that other employers’ top performers will be your top performers then poach away. However, it you want to hire your own top performers, the add a talent assessment to your screening process.
I have to admit I have been of two minds about this. It is one of the slight differences of working in non-profits. I’ve come to a conclusion that aligns pretty well with yours. If you’re not poaching in either arena you aren’t doing your job, which should be focused on driving top talent to your organization. What in the world was I thinking! What do others think “passive candidate” means. They’re working somewhere else!